Madras High Court

WP/37585/2026 of M/S.SRI AKSHAYA CATTLE FEEDS, REP. BY ITS PROPRIET Vs THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER - 2 on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 37585 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP No. 37585 of 2026

and WMP.No.42191 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012113002026}

M/s.Sri Akshaya Cattle Feeds,

Rep. By Its Proprietor,

Sri.M.S.Manikanda Prabhu,

No.1/689-b, Jambukuttapatti, Pochampalli, Krishnagiri - 635206.

..Petitioner

Vs

The Deputy State Tax Officer - 2

Krishnagiri - II Assessment Circle, Krishnagiri.

..Respondent

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the impugned proceeding passed by the respondent in GSTIN - 33CDFPM4477F1ZI/2021-22

and quash the proceeding dated 11.11.2025 passed therein.

For Petitioner:

Mr. Raveendran B

For Respondent:

Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran

Additional Government Pleader (Tax)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order dated 11.11.2025 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice.

2. Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Additional Government Pleader (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

( Uploaded on: 05/10/2026 05:10:09 pm )

WP No. 37585 of 2026

3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 50% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within five months from the date of remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the attachment, if any, of the bank account of the petitioner in relation to the impugned order shall stand raised.

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 29-09-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ

( Uploaded on: 05/10/2026 05:10:09 pm )

WP No. 37585 of 2026

To The Deputy State Tax Officer - 2 Krishnagiri - II Assessment Circle, Krishnagiri.

( Uploaded on: 05/10/2026 05:10:09 pm )

WP No. 37585 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 37585 of 2026 29-09-2026

( Uploaded on: 05/10/2026 05:10:09 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead