Madras High Court

WP/38472/2026 of M/s.Vincent Anand Raj Vs The Deputy State Tax officer - 2 on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 38472 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP No. 38472 of 2026

and WMP.Nos.43171 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012251992026}

M/s.Vincent Anand Raj

Rep by its Proprietor - Anna Nagar Trading Company, Old no.103, no.3, Y block 5th street, Anna nagar, Chennai- 600040.

..Petitioner

Vs

The Deputy State Tax officer - 2

Office of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Amaindakarai Assessment Circle, F-50, First Avenue, Anna Nagar (East), Chennai-102.

..Respondent

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the Respondent in the impugned order vide GSTIN : 33AMFPA8672D1ZC /2017-18 dated 26.12.2023 along with summary order in FORM GST DRC 07 vide ref. no. ZD331223207919F dated 26.12.2023 passed under Section 73 for the FY April 2017 - March 2018, to quash the same.

For Petitioner:

Mr. SRP. Dhayanithi

for Ms. R. Hemalatha

For Respondent:

Ms. G. Dhana Madhri

Special Government Pleader (Tax)

WP No. 38472 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order dated 26.12.2023 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice.

2. Ms. G. Dhana Madhri, learned Special Government Pleader (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 100% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 100% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within five months from the date of remittance of 100% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the attachment, if any, of the bank account of the petitioner in relation to the impugned order shall stand raised.

WP No. 38472 of 2026

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 29-09-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To The Deputy State Tax officer - 2 Office of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Amaindakarai Assessment Circle, F-50, First Avenue, Anna Nagar (East), Chennai-102.

WP No. 38472 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 38472 of 2026 29-09-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead