Madras High Court

WP/38618/2026 of The South Indian Bank Ltd Vs THE TAHSILDAR on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 38618 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

WP No. 38618 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA012067992026}

The South Indian Bank Ltd

Represented by its Chief Manager,

Jacob D, S/o.Mr.Devaraj,

Regional Office, No. 1084,

Trichy Road, Sungam, Coimbatore- 641 018.

..Petitioner

Vs

1. The Tahsildar

Tiruppur North Taluk,

157, Kumaran Road, Kannapiran Colony,

Valipalayam, Tiruppur District,

Tamil Nadu- 641 601.

2. Zonal Deputy Tahsildar

Office of the Tahsildar,

Tiruppur North Taluk,

157, Kumaran Road, Kannapiran Colony,

Valipalayam, Tiruppur District,

Tamil Nadu- 641 601.

3. The District Collector

District Collectorate,

Master Plan Complex, Palladam Road,

Tiruppur- 641 604.

4. The District Revenue Officer

Kumaran Road,

Near Tiruppur Railway Station,

Tiruppur- 641 601.

5. M/s.Asia Pacific International

Represented by its Partners,

D.No. 736, P.N.Road, Tiruppur- 641 602.

( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 01:34:01 pm )

WP No. 38618 of 2026

6. Sushila P.A

7. Radha S

8. Pushpalatha K

9. N.Prakash

10.R.karthikeyan

11.J.Rajendran

12.B.Indhrani

13.B.Muralidharan

14.B.Vishnuprasath

15.R.Balasubramaniam

Advocate Commissioner

..Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of mandamus directing Respondents 1 to 4 to restore the revenue entries in accordance with the title documents reflecting the ownership of Mr.B.Muralidharan and Mr.B.Vishnuprasath, the Respondents 13 and 14 herein, over the property admeasuring in all 170 cents (133 plus 9.50 Plus 27.50) situated in Block No.19 /15 (old T.S. No.66), Block no.19/3

(old T.S.No.62) at survey No. 29,30A in Thottipalayam Village, Tiruppur Taluk and thus rectify the discrepancy in Town Survey and Land Register extracts to enable the petitioner to execute the orders of Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruppur for taking physical Possession of the property to recover the its legal dues.

For Petitioner:

Mr.Om Prakash, Senior Counsel for

M/s.V. Rajeswari

For Respondents:

Mr.B.Pachaiyappan

Additional General Pleader(For R1 to R4)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondents 1 to 4 to restore the revenue entries in accordance with the title documents.

( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 01:34:01 pm )

WP No. 38618 of 2026

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition to rectify the Town Survey Land Record (TSLR) in respect of the subject property, measuring an aggregate extent of 1.70 acres (comprising 1.33 acres, 0.09½ acres, and 0.27½ acres), situated within the Tiruppur Registration District, Tiruppur Joint-I Sub- Registrar Office (SRO), Tiruppur Taluk, New Ward No. 4, Thottipalayam Village. The said property was mortgaged by respondents 13 and 14 to secure financial facilities availed by the fifth respondent partnership firm, against which total outstanding dues stand at ₹50,73,15,166.59 (Rupees fifty crore seventy-three lakh fifteen thousand one hundred sixty-six and paise fifty-nine only) as on 10.08.2026. The credit facilities are secured by the aforesaid property measuring 1.70 acres, among other immovable properties that have since been sold or released.

3. The loan accounts of the fifth respondent were classified as a Non- Performing Asset (NPA). Consequently, the petitioner initiated action under the SARFAESI Act and intended to take physical possession of the subject property measuring 1.70 acres; however, the efforts were in vain. The petitioner subsequently came to know of a report from the first respondent, which revealed that the TSLR extract dated 23.05.2023 erroneously reflects the ownership of a portion of the mortgaged property, measuring 1.33 acres, in the

( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 01:34:01 pm )

WP No. 38618 of 2026

names of neighbouring owners instead of the actual owners who mortgaged the said property. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner sent a letter to respondents 1 and 4, with a copy marked to the third respondent and the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Tiruppur, seeking restoration of the revenue entries based on the earlier TSLR records. Since the said representation has not been considered to date, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.

4. In reply, the learned Additional Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 4, submits that the competent authority to consider the petitioner’s letter dated 23.06.2026 is the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruppur. Since the said official has not been formally impleaded as a party to this Writ Petition, a direction may be issued to the said official to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation/letter dated 23.06.2026.

5. In response, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that a copy of the said representation has already been duly marked to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruppur.

6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, and perused the materials available on record.

( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 01:34:01 pm )

WP No. 38618 of 2026

7. Considering the fact that a copy of the representation was marked to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruppur (North Taluk), this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the said Revenue Divisional Officer to consider the petitioner’s letter/representation dated 23.06.2026 on its own merits and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after issuing notice to all parties concerned, including the petitioner and any rival claimants.

8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 29-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SK To

1. The Tahsildar Tiruppur North Taluk, 157, Kumaran Road, Kannapiran Colony, Valipalayam, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu- 641 601.

2. Zonal Deputy Tahsildar Office of the Tahsildar, Tiruppur North Taluk, 157, Kumaran Road, Kannapiran Colony, Valipalayam, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu- 641 601.

3. The District Collector District Collectorate, Master Plan Complex, Palladam Road, Tiruppur- 641 604.

( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 01:34:01 pm )

WP No. 38618 of 2026

4. The District Revenue Officer Kumaran Road, Near Tiruppur Railway Station, Tiruppur- 641 601. Copy to: The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, 185, Kumaran Road, Kannipiran Colony, Valipalayam, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu - 641601.

( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 01:34:01 pm )

WP No. 38618 of 2026

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. SK WP No. 38618 of 2026 29-09-2026

( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 01:34:01 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead