Madras High Court

WP/38627/2026 of M/s.K.P.K.Visalakshi and company Vs The Commercial Tax officer on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 38627 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP No. 38627 of 2026

and WMP.No.43337 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012219152026}

M/s.K.P.K.Visalakshi and company

Rep. by its Partner Selvaraj, A/2,

Karthikeyan Road, Arni,

Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu- 632301.

..Petitioner

Vs

The Commercial Tax Officer

Office of the Commercial Tax Officer,

Arni, Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu.

..Respondent

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the respondent in the order vide GSTIN:33AA4FK0678C1ZT/2017-2018 dated 31.10.2023 along with the consequential summary order under Section 73 of TNGST/CGST Act, 2017

issued vide FORM DRC-07 Ref. No. ZD331023210034E dated 31.10.2023 for the financial year 2017-2018, to quash the same.

For Petitioner:

Ms. R. Swetha

for Ms. R. Hemalatha

For Respondent:

Ms. G. Dhana Madhri

Special Government Pleader (Tax)

WP No. 38627 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order dated 31.10.2023 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice.

2. Ms. G. Dhana Madhri, learned Special Government Pleader (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 100% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 100% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within five months from the date of remittance of 100% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the attachment, if any, of the bank account of the petitioner in relation to the impugned order shall stand raised.

WP No. 38627 of 2026

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 29-09-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To The Commercial Tax Officer Office of the Commercial Tax Officer, Arni, Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu.

WP No. 38627 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 38627 of 2026 29-09-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead