Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5427/2026 of P.Vadivel Vs The Superintendent of Police on 29 September 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5427 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 29-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5427 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011367342026}
P.Vadivel
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police
Dindigul District,
Dindigul.
2. The Inspector of Police
Sempatti Police Station,
Dindigul District.
3. M/s.Sakthi Finance Limited
Rep by its Branch Manager,
No.67/3, Nehruji Nagar,
Dindigul District.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take action in accordance with law against the 3rd respondent and its recovery agents for the illegal repossession of the petitioners vehicle bearing Registration No.TN 57 CZ 8098, based on the petitioner’s complaint dated 18.09.2026 and to secure the petitioner’s vehicle from the 3rd respondent, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.
__________
( Uploaded on: 22/10/2026 04:19:58 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5427 of 2026
For Petitioner(s):
M/s. C.Narendren
For Respondent(s):
Mr. D. Rajaboopathy,
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
for R1 and R2.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard both sides.
2. Mr. D. Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), takes notice for the 1st and 2nd respondent.
3. When the matter was taken up today, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that, the petitioner himself has given a letter dated 27.09.2026 to the 2nd respondent police stating that the Finance Company that is 3rd respondent is ready to hand over the vehicle to the petitioner, he already paid the balance amount on 25.09.2026 and the Finance Company assured that vehicle should be returned to the petitioner on 28.09.2026.
4. In this regard, the petitioner given a letter dated 27.09.2026 to the police. It was put to the learned counsel for the petitioner knowledge. He submitted that if it is so that may be recorded and the petition may be disposed. __________
( Uploaded on: 22/10/2026 04:19:58 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5427 of 2026
5. Recording the above aspects, without notice to the 3rd respondent, this petition is closed and the petitioner may go to the 3rd respondent and receive the vehicle as per his own statement given to the police. 29-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No psm __________
( Uploaded on: 22/10/2026 04:19:58 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5427 of 2026 To
1. The Superintendent of Police Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2. The Inspector of Police Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul District.
3. M/s.Sakthi Finance Limited Rep by its Branch Manager, No.67/3, Nehruji Nagar, Dindigul District. __________
( Uploaded on: 22/10/2026 04:19:58 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5427 of 2026 DR.P.MURUGAN, J. psm WP Crl.(MD) No. 5427 of 2026 29-09-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 22/10/2026 04:19:58 pm )