Madras High Court
CRP(MD)/1992/2023 of S. AVUDAIAPPAN Vs Ponnukutty on 28 September 2026
CRP(MD) No. 1992 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 29-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA
CRP(MD) No. 1992 of 2023
CNR:{HCMD010735292023}
and CMP(MD) No. 9950 of 2023
S. Avudaiappan
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
Ponnukutty
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the TN Buildings (Lease and Rent) Control Act, to set aside the fair and decreetal order made in
I.A.No.105 of 2016 in R.C.A.No.18 of 2021 on the file of Rent Control Appellate Tribunal Cum Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli dated 06-04-2023
confirming the fair and decreetal order made in R.C.O.P.No.28 of 2018 on the file Principal District Rent Controller Court cum Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli, dated 05-10-2020, allow the above civil revision petition and thus render justice.
For Petitioner(s):
M/s. S.Kumar
For Respondent(s):
M/s. T.Selvan
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decreetal order made in I.A.No.105 of 2016 in R.C.A.No.18 of 2021 on the file of Rent Control Appellate Tribunal Cum Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli dated 06-04-2023 confirming the fair and decreetal order made in R.C.O.P.No.28 of 2018 on the file Principal District Rent Controller Court cum Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli, dated 05-10-2020. __________
( Uploaded on: 13/10/2026 10:51:11 am )
CRP(MD) No. 1992 of 2023
2. When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner/tenant submitted that the petitioner/tenant was not able to take his belongings kept inside the premises for handing over vacant possession.
3. The learned counsel for the respondent/landlord admitted that he would permit the petitioner/tenant to take all his belongings kept inside the premises.
4. Taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances of the case, and also considering the fact that possession has already been taken by the respondent/landlord, the present petition has become infructuous.
5. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition stands closed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 29-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No DSS __________
( Uploaded on: 13/10/2026 10:51:11 am )
CRP(MD) No. 1992 of 2023 To
1. The Rent Control Appellate Tribunal Cum Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli.
2. The Principal District Rent Controller Court cum Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli.
3. The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. __________
( Uploaded on: 13/10/2026 10:51:11 am )
CRP(MD) No. 1992 of 2023 R.POORNIMA, J. dss CRP(MD) No. 1992 of 2023 AND CMP(MD) No. 9950 of 2023 29-09-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 13/10/2026 10:51:11 am )