Madras High Court
CS/29/2026 of Mr. S. Sudhakar Vs Mr. S. Prasanna Venkatesan on 28 September 2026
CS No. 29 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
CS No. 29 of 2026
and
O.A.No.102 of 2026
and
A.678 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA013055192025}
Mr. S. Sudhakar
S/o.S.K.Srinivas (late),
G1, Srinivasa Nilaya,
Nandakumar Layout,
Arehalli Main Road,
Bengaluru-560 061.
..Plaintiff(s)
Vs
Mr. S. Prasanna Venkatesan
S/o.S.K.Srinivasan(late)
S2, Alraza Glendale,
88, Ellaiyamman Kovil Street,
Vannathurai, Adyar,
Chennai-600020
..Defendant(s)
Prayer: Civil Suit is filed under Order VII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 read with Order IV Rule 1 of Madras High Court original Side Rules, 1956, praying a) to pass a preliminary decree of partition of Schedule A and B
properties by metes and bounds and to allot 1/2 share in Schedule A and B
properties in favour of the plaintiff b) To pass a Decree of permanent Injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff’s 1/2 share in the Schedule A and B mentioned properties.
For Plaintiff(s):
Mr. M. Ashwin Kumar
For Defendant(s):
Mr.Eswar Kumar Rao
for Sole Defendant
CS No. 29 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
This Civil Suit has been filed seeking a preliminary decree for partition of the properties described in Schedules A and B, by metes and bounds, and for allotment of a ½ share in the Schedule A and B properties in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has also sought a decree of permanent Injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff’s 1/2 share in the properties described in Schedules A and B.
2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for both sides submitted that the matter had already been referred to the learned Mediator pursuant to the order of this Court dated 16.06.2026 and that the matter had been amicably settled before the learned Mediator at the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court of Madras. The Mediation and Conciliation Centre has now forwarded a report along with enclosing a Joint Compromise Memo dated 27.08.2026 entered into between the parties.
3. The terms of the said Joint Compromise Memo are affirmed by the learned counsel appearing for both sides. The plaintiff and the defendant are present before this Court and have admitted their respective signatures and the terms of the Joint Compromise Memo.
CS No. 29 of 2026
4. In view of the above, the Civil Suit is decreed in terms of the Joint Compromise Memo. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected applications are closed. The Joint Compromise Memo dated 27.08.2026 shall form part of the decree. The Registry may refund the Court Fee to the plaintiffs in accordance with the rules, upon proper acknowledgment and undertaking. 28-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No av
CS No. 29 of 2026
K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. av CS No. 29 of 2026 and O.A.No.102 of 2026 and A.678 of 2026 28-09-2026