Madras High Court

WP/37131/2026 of YES GE KARGO Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer- II on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 37131 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP No. 37131 of 2026

and WMP.No.41694 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012093272026}

Yes Ge Kargo

Represented by its Partner A. Jayavelu

2nd Floor, No.118/16, Marbell Hall Complex, Vepery High Road, Periamet, Chennai 600003.

..Petitioner

Vs

The Deputy State Tax Officer- II

Office of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Vepery Assessment Circle, No.1, Room No.A -110, CT Annexe Building, 1st Floor, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006.

..Respondent

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the Respondent in the Impugned Rectification Order in GSTIN:

33AABFY7636F1Z4 / 2021-22 dated 20.12.2025 along with consequential order in Form DRC-07 bearing Ref. No. ZD331225324190Z dated 20.12.2025

for the year 2021-2022 and quash the same as arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice.

For Petitioner:

Mr. S.Kannan

Mr. Vighnesh Kumar

For Respondent:

Mr. B. Sivaraman

Government Advocate (Tax)

WP No. 37131 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order in original dated 20.12.2025 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice.

2. Mr. B.Sivaraman, learned Government Advocate (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 10% pre-deposit was made while lodging the appeal and the petitioner would remit an additional 15% of the tax demand so as to remit 25% in the aggregate as a condition for remand. An endorsement has been made on the bundle to that effect.

4. Subject to the petitioner remitting an additional 15% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, after giving credit to 10% pre-deposit made earlier, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order in original is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within five months from the date of remittance of additional 15% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the attachment, if any, of the bank account of the petitioner in relation to the impugned order shall stand raised.

WP No. 37131 of 2026

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 28-09-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To The Deputy State Tax Officer- II Office of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Vepery Assessment Circle, No.1, Room No.A -110, CT Annexe Building, 1st Floor, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006.

WP No. 37131 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 37131 of 2026 28-09-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead