Madras High Court

WP/37227/2026 of Ardens Business Solutions Private Limited Vs Deputy commercial Tax officer/Deputy State Tax Off on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 37227 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP No. 37227 of 2026

and WMP.Nos.41789 & 41792 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012036282026}

Ardens Business Solutions Private Limited Rep. by Augustin Raj .A, No 43, Pallavaram Main Road, Manancherry, Kundrathur, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu – 600069.

..Petitioner

Vs

Deputy Commercial Tax Officer/Deputy State Tax Officer-2, Kundrathur Assessment Circle No.4/109, Bangalore High Way Road, Varadarajapuram, Nazarethpet, Chennai-600 123.

..Respondent

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the Order via FORM GST DRC 07 having Ref. No. ZD330225114643T for FY 20-21 dated 12.02.2025 (Impugned Order) issued by the Respondent and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and direct to remand back the matter to the respondent.

For Petitioner:

Mr. Surya V.

for Mr. A. Dhamodaran

WP No. 37227 of 2026

For Respondent:

Mr. B. Sivaraman

Government Advocate (Tax)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order dated 12.02.2025 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice.

2. Mr. B. Sivaraman, learned Government Advocate (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within five months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the attachment, if any, of the bank account of the petitioner in relation to the impugned order shall stand raised.

WP No. 37227 of 2026

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 28-09-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To Deputy Commercial Tax Officer/Deputy State Tax Officer-2, Kundrathur Assessment Circle No.4/109, Bangalore High Way Road, Varadarajapuram, Nazarethpet, Chennai-600 123.

WP No. 37227 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 37227 of 2026 28-09-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead