Madras High Court

WP/37281/2026 of P.RAJA Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer -2 on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 37281 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP No. 37281 of 2026

and WMP.Nos.41869 & 41870 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA011668482026}

P.Raja

S/o.Pandurangan,

KPR Maligai, 190,NA Bazaar Street,

Virudhachalam, Cuddalore- 606 001.

..Petitioner

Vs

The Deputy State Tax Officer -2

Virudhachalam Assessment Circle,

Commercial Taxes Department,

Commercial Taxes Building,

Vayalur, Ulundurpet Main Road,

Near Railway Bridge, Virudhachalam,

Cuddalore- 606 001.

..Respondent

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the Respondent in the impugned Proceedings bearing reference number GSTIN: 33AICPR6402M1Z7/ 2021- 22 dated 26.12.2025 passed by the Respondent, under the Provision of TNGST / CGST Act, 2017 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to pass DE NOVO order.

For Petitioner:

Ms. T.P.Savitha

For Respondent:

Mr. B. Sivaraman

Government Advocate (Tax)

WP No. 37281 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order dated 26.12.2025 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice.

2. Mr. B. Sivaraman, learned Government Advocate (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within five months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the attachment, if any, of the bank account of the petitioner in relation to the impugned order shall stand raised.

WP No. 37281 of 2026

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 28-09-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To The Deputy State Tax Officer -2 Virudhachalam Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Department, Commercial Taxes Building, Vayalur, Ulundurpet Main Road, Near Railway Bridge, Virudhachalam, Cuddalore- 606 001.

WP No. 37281 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 37281 of 2026 28-09-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead