Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/4809/2026 of S. Panneerselvam Vs The Superintendent of Police on 28 September 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 28.09.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN
WP Crl.(MD) NO. 4809 of
{CNR: HCMD011185152026} Case QR
S.Panneerselvam
S/o.Senthati Kalai
No.151/30, Pethaya Pillai Street
Rajapalayam 626 117
Virudhunagar District.
... Petitioner
.Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police
District Police Office,
Virudhunagar District.
Virudhunagar.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
O/o.The Deputy Superintendent of Police
Srivilliputhur 626 125,
Virudhunagar District.
3. The Inspector of Police
Koomapatti Police Station
Watrap,
Virudhunagar District.
4. Ramani
W/o.Late.Sangaihya
No.2/24,West Street, Kansapuram Village 626 133, Watrap Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
5. S.Niraipandi
S/o.Late.Sangaihya
No.2/24, West Street
Kansapuram Village 626 133
Watrap Taluk,
Virudhunagar District.
6. S.Mariappan
S/o.Late.Sangaihya
No.2/24, West Street,
Kansapuram Village 626 133,
Watrap Taluk,
Virudhunagar District.
7. Veeralakshmi
D/o.Late.Sangaihya
No.2/24, West Street
Kansapuram Village 626 133
Watrap Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to grant police protection for fencing the in petitioners property in Survey Nos.1108/1, 1112/1A, 1112/1B, 1112/1C, 1112/2, 1112/3, 1112/7, 1113/4A, 1109/3, 1109/2, 1105/5A and 1105/5B, situated at Kansapuram Village in Watrap Taluk of Vinudhunagar District in the light of the Judgment and Decree dated 10.06.2008 made in O.S.No.294 of 2003 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Srivilliputhur by considering the
petitioner's representation dated 04.08.2026.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Athimoolapandian
For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy for R1 to R3
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Mr.S.Selvakumar for R4 to R7
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This case was finally heard on 24.09.2026 and reserved for orders. On the next day, i.e., on 25.09.2026, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner mentioned before this Court that the petitioner intends to withdraw the present case and sought permission to submit a letter/memo before the Registry to list the matter under the caption "For Withdrawal". The said request was acceded to by this Court.
2. Accordingly, the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 25.09.2026 before the Registry seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the case.
3. In view of the memo filed and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, permission is granted to withdraw the case.
4. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 28.09.2026 TM To
1. The Superintendent of Police District Police Office, Virudhunagar District. Virudhunagar.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police O/o.The Deputy Superintendent of Police Srivilliputhur 626 125, Virudhunagar District.
3. The Inspector of Police Koomapatti Police Station Watrap, Virudhunagar District.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
DR.P.MURUGAN, J., TM WP.Crl.(MD).No.4809 of 2026 28.09.2026