Madras High Court
CRL RC/2169/2026 of P.Thamilarasi Vs H.Haijulal on 25 September 2026
CRL RC No. 2169 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
CRL RC No. 2169 of 2026
& CRL MP No. 18046 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA012201462026}
P.Thamilarasi
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
H.Haijulal
..Respondent(s)
Prayer: The Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 438 r/w 442 of BNSS, to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 30.07.2026 passed in Crl.MP.No.4 of 2026 in Crl.A.No.1125 of 2025 by the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court No.I for MP/MLA Cases, XIX Additional Court(FAC), City Civil Court, Chennai and set aside the order dated 30.07.2026 passed in Crl.MP.No.4
of 2026 in Crl.A.No.1125 of 2025.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.M.Devanthiran
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The Revision challenges the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge allowing the petition under Section 391 Cr.P.C.,/432 BNSS, filed by the respondent/accused, praying for filing additional documents.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent had sufficient opportunity during trial to produce those documents and the petition filed under Section 391 Cr.P.C., is only to delay the appeal.
CRL RC No. 2169 of 2026
3. On perusal of the impugned order it is seen that the Court had considered all the facts and found those documents to be relevant to decide the appeal.
4. This Court finds no infirmity in the said order. However, the said documents cannot be read in evidence, unless the petitioner accepts the genuineness of those documents. The documents can be marked only through witnesses and it is needless to say that the petitioner is at liberty to cross- examine the said witnesses. The Sessions Judge shall complete the above process and dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible.
5. With the above observation, the Revision is dismissed. 25-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No TSG To
1. Sessions Judge, Special Court No.I for MP/MLA Cases, XIX Additional Court(FAC), City Civil Court, Chennai.
2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.
CRL RC No. 2169 of 2026
SUNDER MOHAN, J. TSG CRL RC No. 2169 of 2026 & CRL MP No. 18046 of 2026 25-09-2026