Madras High Court
CRP/6009/2026 of Sakthikumar Vs A.S.Selvaraj on 25 September 2026
CRP No. 6009 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
CRP No. 6009 of 2026
& CMP.No.26067 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA011808822026}
Sakthikumar
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
A.S.Selvaraj
..Respondent(s)
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the Docket Return order, dated 01.11.2025 passed by the IV
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore in Unnumbered EA.No. of 2026 in EP.No.19 of 2015 and consequently direct the learned Judge to take the interim application on file and number the same.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.R.D.Ashok Kumar
for M/s.N.Lavanya
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The present revision is directed against the docket return order dated 01.11.2025 in an Unnumbered E.A.No.____ of 2026 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore, returning the Section 47 application filed by the petitioner.
CRP No. 6009 of 2026
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner.
3. On going through the records, I find that the Section 47 application filed by the petitioner has been returned, questioning the maintainability of the application. Without even representing the said return or complying with the returns, the present revision has been filed.
4. Following the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Mahanagar Door Sanchar Bhawan, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Next to Dr.Zakir Hussain College, New Delhi – 110 002 Vs. Bharti Airtel Limited, represented by its Legal Manager, Mr.Harish Rangarajan, reported in 2013-4-L.W.225, as well as the recent decision of this Court in K.Selvaraj Vs. Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant India Limited represented through its Project Director, reported in (2021) 4 CTC 539, I am inclined to set aside the docket return order dated 01.11.2025.
5. In fine, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the docket return order dated 01.11.2025 in an Unnumbered E.A.No.____ of 2026 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore, is set aside. The IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore, is directed to post the matter in open Court and hear the counsel for the petitioner on maintainability and thereafter, pass orders in the application, including the maintainability of
CRP No. 6009 of 2026
the application, within a period of two weeks from the date of production of this order copy and if the counsel for the petitioner makes out a case for maintainability of the application, then the Court shall ensure that the application is numbered and disposed of, after affording an opportunity to the respondent decree holder. No costs. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 25-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ATA
CRP No. 6009 of 2026
P.B.BALAJI, J. ATA To The IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. CRP No. 6009 of 2026 25-09-2026