Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5373/2026 of I.Kalantar Aasik Ahamadu Vs The Superintendent of Police on 25 September 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5373 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 25-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5373 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011358412026}
Kalantar Aasik Ahamadu
S/o.Iqbal Sahib,
12/6, Mohamed Rowther Pillai Street,
Thondi 623 409,
Thiruadanai Taluk,
Ramanathapuram District.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police
O/o.The Superintendent of Police,
Ramanathapuram District.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
O/o.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
3. The Inspector of Police
Thondi Police Station,
Thiruvadanai Taluk,
Ramanathapuram District.
..Respondent(s)
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent no.1 to take suitable action based on the petitioner’s complaint dated 04.05.2026.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.R.L.Dhilipan Pandian for Mr.S.Atham Ali For Respondent(s):
Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5373 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No.1 to take suitable action based on the petitioner’s complaint dated 04.05.2026.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the records.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that, though the petitioner might have sent the complaint dated 04.05.2026 to the first respondent, namely, the Superintendent of Police, no such complaint has been received by the third respondent either directly from the petitioner or through the first respondent. It is further submitted that, if the petitioner submits a fresh representation before the third respondent, the same will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed in accordance with law.
4. Recording the above submission, the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh representation before the third respondent. On receipt of
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5373 of 2026
such representation, the third respondent shall consider and dispose of the same after conducting due enquiry with the petitioner as well as the rival party, in accordance with law, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 25-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No TM To
1. The Superintendent of Police O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police O/o.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
3. The Inspector of Police Thondi Police Station, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5373 of 2026
DR.P.MURUGAN, J. TM WP Crl.(MD) No. 5373 of 2026 25-09-2026