Madras High Court
CONT P/2823/2023 of R.Munusawmy Vs Kumara Kurubaran,IAS., and 3 others on 24 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24-09-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
CONT P No. 2823 of 2023
CNR:{HCMA011978572023}
1. R.Munusawmy
S/o.Raji, Erathangal Pudur Village,
Erathangal Post, Gudiyatham Taluk,
Vellore District - 632 601.
Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. Kumara Kurubaran,IAS., and 3 others
Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai
- 9.
2.Arivoli
Director of School Education, College
Road, Chennai - 6.
3.Nesa Praba
District Educational Officer, Thirupattur now at Vellore, Vellore District.
4.Devaraj
Head Master, Government Higher
Secondary School, Koodanagaram,
Gudiyatham Taluk, Vellore District.
Contemnor(s)
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1972 to punish the respondents for their wilful disobeying the order of the Hon’ble High Court in WP No.24068 of 2017 dated 02.06.2023.
( Uploaded on: 25/09/2026 08:22:28 pm )
CONT P No. 2823 of 2023
P.B.BALAJI.,J
sr
For Petitioner
: MR.K.Arumugam
For Contemnor(s):
Mr.T.Gowthaman
Addl.Advocat General
assisted by
Mrs.Kalpa Reddy
Special Government Pleader
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The learned Additional Advocate General today brings to my notice that Government Order has been issued and there has been substantial compliance with the order passed in the writ petition in W.P.No.24068 of 2017. A copy of the Government Order in G.O.(1D)No.182 dated 18.09.2026 is also made available to the Court and a copy of the same is also furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The learned Additional Advocate General would state that respondents would take diligent steps to ensure that subsequent compliance by making necessary payments to the petitioner will be effected in due course.
3. Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed. The respondents shall settle the monetary claims within a period of four weeks from today. 24.09.2026 sr
( Uploaded on: 25/09/2026 08:22:28 pm )