Madras High Court
CRL RC/2087/2026 of M.D.Abirame Vs A.Ravindrababu on 24 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
CRL RC No. 2087 of 2026 And
Crl.M.P.No.17545 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA012222612026}
M.D.Abirame
D/o. Manivannan,
No.129, 1st Block, T5 Kochar Panchsheel
Apartments,
C.T.H.Road, Ambattur Industrial Estate,
Chennai – 600 098.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
A.Ravindrababu
S/o Ramaiah,
No.47/23, T.P.Kovil,
1st Street, Triplicane,
Chennai – 600 005.
..Respondent(s)
Prayer:
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 438 r/w.442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to call for the records of Crl.M.P.Sr.No.1159 of 2026 in Crl.A.No.433 of 2025 dated 21.08.2026 on the file of XVII Additional District and Sessions Court at Chennai and set aside the same.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.S.Karthikeyan, for Mr.K.Rahul
For Respondent(s):
Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The revision challenges the docket order passed by the learned XVII
Additional District and Sessions Judge holding the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 432 of BNSS as not maintainable.
2. The petitioner was convicted by the trial Court in S.T.C.No.2581 of 2023 for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Pending appeal, the petitioner had filed application under Section 391 of Cr.P.C. to summon P.W.1 for cross examination. The trial Court dismissed the said application in Crl.M.P.No.3 of 2025. The petitioner had approached this Court in Crl.R.C.No.1369 of 2026 and it is stated by the learned counsels on either side that this Court on 19.08.2026 had dismissed the said revision. Thereafter, the petitioner sought for examination of additional witness to mark certain documents.
3. According to the petitioner, those documents have been marked by the accused who is the brother of the petitioner in a connected case and therefore, those documents are necessary to establish the petitioner’s innocence. They are the following documents: “1.Copy of the Loan Repayment Agreement dated 29.04.2022
2. Copy of the Legal Notice dated 22.06.2022
3. Copy of the reply notice un-dated
4. Copy of the Death Certificate of the child dated 17.12.2023
5. Copy of the order in Crl.O.P.No.27883/2024 dated 14.11.2024
6. Copy of the Repayment of Account statements
7. Copy of the cross examination of PW1 in S.T.C.No.2580/2023”
4. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection for reading the above documents in evidence in terms of Section 294 of Cr.P.C./ 330 of B.N.S.S., except Document No.7 which would be subject to Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act.
5. Hence the above documents except Document No.7 shall be read in evidence. The trial Court shall expedite the process of hearing the appeal and conclude it as expeditiously as possible.
6. With the above observation, this criminal revision case is disposed of. Consequently, the connected criminal miscellaneous petition is closed. 24-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No pri To The XVII Additional District and Sessions Court at Chennai.
SUNDER MOHAN, J. pri CRL RC No. 2087 of 2026 And Crl.M.P.No.17545 of 2026 24-09-2026