Madras High Court

CRL RC/2161/2026 of Suryabalaji Investment Pvt Ltd Vs The Income Tax Officer (UTO) on 24 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL RC No. 2161 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

CRL RC No. 2161 of 2026

and Crl.M.P.No.18005 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA011596742026}

1. M/s.Suryabalaji Investment Pvt Ltd

Rep. by Shri M Ravichandran,

S/o Meenakshi Sundaram,

Managing Director,

No.3C, Lakshmipuram,

3rd Cross, Ganapathy, Coimbatore.

2. M.Ravichandran

3. P.Vasuki

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

The Income Tax Officer (UTO)

Corporate Ward 3

Income Tax Office,

67A, Race Course Road,

Coimbatore.

..Respondent(s)

Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Sections 438 r/w 442 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records relating to impugned order passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore, in Crl.M.P.No.9063 of 2025 in C.C.No.1571 of 2025 dated 05.03.2026 and set aside the same and consequently discharge the petitioners in the above

C.C.No.1571 of 2025 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore.

( Uploaded on: 29/09/2026 04:19:58 pm )

CRL RC No. 2161 of 2026

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.R.Karthik

For Respondent(s):

Ms.M.Sheela

Senior Standing Counsel

for Mr.H.Siddarth

Jr.Standing Counsel for Income Tax

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Mr.R.Karthik, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the Revision and has made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Permission granted. The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

3. However, on the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the appearance of the petitioners before the trial Court is dispensed with, provided they are represented by a lawyer unless their presence is required by the learned trial Judge for the progress of the trial. It is needless to state that if the petitioners fail to obey with the directions of the trial Court regarding appearance, the order passed by this Court will lose its efficacy. 24-09-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No ham

( Uploaded on: 29/09/2026 04:19:58 pm )

CRL RC No. 2161 of 2026

To

1. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore.

2. The Income Tax Officer (UTO) Corporate Ward 3 Income Tax Office, 67A, Race Course Road, Coimbatore.

( Uploaded on: 29/09/2026 04:19:58 pm )

CRL RC No. 2161 of 2026

SUNDER MOHAN, J. ham CRL RC No. 2161 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.18005 of 2026 24-09-2026

( Uploaded on: 29/09/2026 04:19:58 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead