Madras High Court

WP(MD)/624/2026 of Bharkavi Vs The District Collector on 24 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 624 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 24-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

AND

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

WP(MD) No. 624 of 2026

and

W.M.P.(MD)No.529 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD010037092026}

Bharkavi

W/o Ilamaran,

No. 58/48 NGGO colony,

Anna Nagar, Devakottai,

Sivagangai District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector

Sivagangai District,

Sivagangai.

2. The Executive Engineer

Water Resource Department,

Sarugani River Drainage Basin Division,

Sivagangai 630 562

3. The Tahsildar

Ilayangudi Taluk,

..Respondent(s)

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS, calling for the records relating to impugned order of the 3rd respondent vide Na.Ka.No.A2/5442/2025, dated 05.12.2025 and quash the same and

WP(MD) No. 624 of 2026

consequently direct the respondents to grant permission to construct the bridge in Nilaviyal Odai Pathai to an extent of 8x4 length and breadth which goes through the survey No.89/5, 89/6 and 89/7A, Thugavur Village, Ilayangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.S.Satheesh Kumar

For Respondent(s):

Mr.S.Sivasubramanian,

Government Advocate.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2. The writ petitioner owns a piece of land in survey No.89/6 in Thugavur Village, Ilayangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. She has also put up a construction. In front of her house, a channel runs through survey Nos.89/5, 89/6 and 89/7A. The petitioner has approached the authority seeking permission to put up a bridge like structure so that she can access her house. Her request was negatived by the third respondent. Hence, this writ petition has been filed.

3. The writ petitioner has after all put up a construction in her own patta land. The right of access cannot be denied. If the said right is denied, the petitioner will not be able to enjoy her rights as a patta holder at all.

WP(MD) No. 624 of 2026

4. We, therefore, direct the second respondent to issue proceedings permitting construction of a bridge like structure so as to facilitate the writ petitioner’s access to her house across the aforementioned channel. The second respondent can stipulate appropriate conditions so as to ensure that the width of the channel is not reduced and the free flow of water is also not affected. This writ petition is allowed on these terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (G.R.S.,J.) (B.P.,J.) 24-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PMU To

1. The District Collector Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2. The Executive Engineer Water Resource Department, Sarugani River Drainage Basin Division, Sivagangai 630 562

3. The Tahsildar Ilayangudi Taluk,

WP(MD) No. 624 of 2026

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND B.PUGALENDHI, J. PMU WP(MD) No. 624 of 2026 24-09-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead