Madras High Court
CONT P/3130/2026 of Mrs. Kumari and another Vs Mrs. Punithavathi (Deceased) and 2 others on 23 September 2026
CONT P No. 3130 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
CONT P No. 3130 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA011869402026}
1. Mrs. Kumari and another
W/o. Late Jayaraman
2. Mrs. Radha,
D/o. Late Jayaraman,
Both are residing at
No. 315, Suriyanarayana Chetty Street,
Kasimedu, Roayapuram,
Chennai 600 013
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. Mrs. Punithavathi (Deceased) and 2 others W/o. Late T.S.Chockalinga Gramani (Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are already in record and Legal heirs of the Respondent No.1, as per the order of the Hon'ble Court, PBBJ, dt.
23.09.2026 made in Cont.P.No. 3130 of 2026
and vide memo sr. no. 35366 of 2026, dt.
25.09.2026)
2. Mrs. Umadevi,
D/o. Late T.S.Chockalinga Gramani
3. Mr. T.C.Shankar,
S/o. Late T.S.Chockalinga Gramani
All are residing at
No. 62/1, Kumbalamman Koil Street,
Tondiarpet, Chennai - 600 081.
..Contemnor(s)
CONT P No. 3130 of 2026
To initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 26.09.2025 passed by this Hon'ble Court in
C.R.P.No. 816 of 2015 and punish the Respondents.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr. V.Manisekaran
For Contemnor(s):
Mr.M.Vijay Anand
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard Mr.V.Manisekaran, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.M.Vijay Anand, learned for the respondent.
2. Though the petitioners, alleging contempt of the order passed by me in C.R.P.No.816 of 2025, by contending that the petitioners were not put on notice and in compliance with the orders passed by this Court, the bailiff and the surveyor has not even identified the property and proceeded to high handedly take delivery of possession from the petitioners, on going through the additional typed set of papers produced by Mr.Vijay Anand, the Executing Court has put on notice about the order passed by this Court in the Civil Revision Petition and directed the bailiff to take the assistance of the surveyor as well as the police authority. The Sub-Inspector of Survey, Tondiarpet Taluk, has also inspected the property, besides, identifying the same. Pursuant to which alone, the senior bailiff, in the presence of the police authorities has effected delivery. Therefore,
CONT P No. 3130 of 2026
I do not find any violation of the directions issued by this Court in the revision petition invoking contempt necessitating contempt proceedings to be initiated against the respondents. Therefore, the Contempt Petition is dismissed. No costs. 01-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VSI
CONT P No. 3130 of 2026
P.B.BALAJI, J. VSI
CONT P No. 3130 of 2026 01-10-2026