Madras High Court
CONT P(MD)/2486/2024 of K.Shyamsundar Vs Anish Sardar on 23 September 2026
CONT P(MD) No. 2486 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 23-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
CONT P(MD) No. 2486 of 2024 in
W.P.(MD)No.14180 of 2024
CNR:{HCMD011168972024}
K.Shyamsundar
S/o.P.Kanyalal,
94-A Gurunanak Nivas, New Avadi Road,
Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. Anish Sardar
The Tahsildar,
Thirupparankundram Taluk,
Thirupparankundram, Madurai District.
2. Rahaina Begum,
The Head Surveyor,
Thirupparankundram Taluk,
Thirupparankundram, Madurai District.
3. P. Vadivel,
S/o. Palaniappan,
Ex Panchayat President,
No.1/124, North Street, Thoppur Village, Thiruparankundram Taluk, Madurai District 625 008.
(R3 IS IMPLEADED VIDE ORDER DATED
16.03.2026 IN SUB A(MD) NO.105/2026)
..Respondent(s)
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to punish the contemnors for wilfully disobeying and violating the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD).No.14180 of 2024
dated 28-06-2024.
( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 04:06:16 pm )
CONT P(MD) No. 2486 of 2024
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.P. Mahendran
For Respondent(s):
M/s.M.Karthikeya Venkatachalapathy
for R-3.
Mr.M.S.Parthiban,
Government Advocate for R-1 & R-2.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard both sides.
2. I am more than convinced that the writ petitioner’s civil rights have been seriously breached. The writ petitioner had purchased 5 cents of property vide sale deed dated 15.07.1984 from one Arachezhiyan. The said name ill suits him. The vendor after selling the 5 cents of property to the writ petitioner herein, sold the very same land by including it in a larger extent to the third respondent Thiru.Vadivel.
3. The sale deed executed in favour of the petitioner herein would obviously find mention in the encumbrance register. Yet in the face of the said entry, Vadivel chose to purchase the property from Arachezhiyan and thereafter, Vadivel also sold the same to third party. At this stage, the petitioner herein filed WP(MD)No.14180 of 2024 for survey and measurement and the writ petition was disposed of by me on 28.06.2024 by issuing the usual set of directions. Contending that the directions have not been complied with, this contempt petition came to be filed.
( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 04:06:16 pm )
CONT P(MD) No. 2486 of 2024
4. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the Tahsildar informed the Court that on account of double entries, they are not able to carry out this order. In these circumstances, it is only just and proper that the petitioner is given liberty to move the jurisdictional civil court as well as the jurisdictional police for enforcing his rights. That the petitioner’s rights have been trampled under foot is beyond dispute. Since factual aspects are involved, it is only the jurisdictional civil Court as well as the jurisdictional police who can grant him relief. Granting the aforesaid liberty and mandating the jurisdictional civil Court as well as the jurisdictional police to take action on the petitioner’s complaint, this contempt petition is disposed of. 23-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PMU
( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 04:06:16 pm )
CONT P(MD) No. 2486 of 2024
To
1. The Tahsildar, Thirupparankundram Taluk, Thirupparankundram, Madurai District.
2. The Head Surveyor, Thirupparankundram Taluk, Thirupparankundram, Madurai District.
( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 04:06:16 pm )
CONT P(MD) No. 2486 of 2024
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. PMU CONT P(MD) No. 2486 of 2024 23-09-2026
( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 04:06:16 pm )