Madras High Court
REV.APLC(MD)/164/2026 of The Government of Tamil Nadu Vs Pavala Malliga on 23 September 2026
REV.APLC(MD) No. 164 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 23-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
REV.APLC(MD) No. 164 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011104902018}
1. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by its District Collector,
Tiruchirappalli.
2. The Tahsildar, Trichy (East) Taluk Office, Town Hall Road, Tiruchirappalli.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
Pavala Malliga W/o. Anbudhasan,
No.12/6-2, Rajaveethi, Kamaraj Nagar,
Ariyamangalam, Trichy District.
..Respondent(s)
Prayer : Review Application filed under Order 47 rule 1 and 2 r/w.114 of Civil Procedure Code to review the order passed in S.A.No. 1222 of 1999 dated 01.12.2016 and thus render justice.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.J.Bharathan, Additional Government Pleader assisted by M.S.Parthiban, Government Advocate For Respondent(s):
Mr.S.C.Herold Singh
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
An application has been filed to review the judgment and decree dated 01.12.2016 made in SA No.1222 of 1999. The respondent herein had succeeded in the second appeal. Based on the outcome of the second
REV.APLC(MD) No. 164 of 2026
appeal, the respondent filed WP(MD)No.13479 of 2023 to enforce the same. The writ petition was allowed. A contempt petition is said to have been instituted for non-compliance of the order made in the writ petition. Hence, the learned Government Advocate Mr.M.S.Parthiban made a mention for taking up the review application.
2. After hearing the learned Additional Advocate General and the learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondent in the second appeal, I am of the view that substantial contentions have been urged. The learned counsel on either side agreed to argue the matter finally on 29.09.2026. The operation of the second appeal shall stand suspended till then.
3. Call this case on 29.09.2026. 23-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SKM
REV.APLC(MD) No. 164 of 2026
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. SKM REV.APLC(MD) No. 164 of 2026 23-09-2026