Supreme Court of India
AJAY KUMAR GUPTA VS. PRAKASH CHAND GUPTA on 28 October 2026
Diary No. 66634/2026
ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.14 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)………………………………. Diary No. 66634/2026
[Arising out of impugned interim/final judgment and order dated 02- 12-2025 in RCREV No. 397/2024 and 16-10-2026 in RP No. 640/2025
passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi]
AJAY KUMAR GUPTA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
PRAKASH CHAND GUPTA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 331745/2026 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING; IA No.
331743/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
Date : 28-10-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nikunj Dayal, Adv.
Mr. Pramod Dayal- 500, AOR
Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Adv.
Mr. Rahul Shukla, Adv.
Ms. Bachita Baruah Shukla, Adv.
Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Adv.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
1. Delay of 228 days in filing is condoned.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. We see no reason to entertain the special leave petitions.
4. The
special
leave
petitions
are, accordingly, dismissed. Digitally signed by SNEHA DAS Date: 2026.10.28 18:29:10 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
Diary No. 66634/2026
5. After the order is dictated, Advocate Nikunj Dayal, requests the Court to grant reasonable time for vacating the premises, as the subject decree stands posted for further steps before the Executing Court tomorrow. It is further stated that the petitioner will be bound by the undertaking, he will be filing in this behalf.
6. Taking note of the above submissions, the petitioner is granted two months’ time from today subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking to the above said effect before the Executing Court within one week from today. The petitioner is under obligation to continue to pay the rent agreed between the parties till vacant possession is handed over.
7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SNEHA DAS) (NIDHI MATHUR) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)