Supreme Court of India
NATTU SINGH @ NAAN BABU VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 28 October 2026
ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.13 SECTION II-C
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 12588/2026
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-12-2025
in CRA No. 1581/2024 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur]
NATTU SINGH @ NAAN BABU Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Respondent(s)
(IA No. 189156/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
IA No. 189157/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 28-10-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR For Petitioner(s): Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma- 1606, AOR Mr. Rohit Vats, Adv. Mr. Yashdeep, Adv. Ms. Vaishali, Adv. Mr. Dev Bhardwaj, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Nasa, Adv.
For Respondent(s): Mr. Apoorv Shukla- 2830, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to our order dated 13.07.2026 and submits that he has now received relevant documents regarding the age of the petitioner. On going through those documents, he submits that petitioner was not a juvenile on the date of occurrence.
2. Be that as it may, we will examine the judgment of conviction on its own merit.
3. List on 10.12.2026. (ABHINAV KUMAR) (CHETNA BALOONI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH) Digitally signed by ABHINAV KUMAR Date: 2026.10.28 18:02:34 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified