Supreme Court of India

RITI SABHARWAL VS. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI on 28 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.16 SECTION II-D

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 20250/2026

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24-09-2026

in WPCRL No. 3008/2026 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi]

RITI SABHARWAL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Respondent(s)

(IA No. 324289/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT)

Date : 28-10-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL

For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Aman Kant Mishra, Adv.

Mr. Ambrish Kumar Rai, Adv.

Mr. Abhishek Kanyalur, Adv.

Ms. Akhila Wali, Adv.

Mr. Ashritsai P. Torgal, Adv.

M/S. Nuli & Nuli- 2021, AOR

For Respondent(s) :Mr. Prashant Sharma, AOR

Mr. Lokender Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

1. Issue notice

2. Mr. Prashant Sharma, learned Advocate-on-Record, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Hence, service of formal notice is waived in respect of respondent No.2. Let notice be issued to respondent No.1.

3. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.

Digitally signed by RAJNI MUKHI Date: 2026.10.28 17:37:07 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner is permitted to serve a copy of the petition to the Standing Counsel for the State of NCT of Delhi.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 jointly made a request for referring the matter to the Supreme Court Mediation and Conciliation Center.

6. In such circumstances, the parties are directed to appear before the Coordinator, Supreme Court Mediation and Conciliation Center on 6th November, 2026 at 11.00 a.m. The Coordinator shall appoint a Mediator and Conciliator to enable the parties to make an effort to settle the matter amicably.

7. Initially, the parties are permitted to appear virtually and thereafter, the parties shall appear as per the directions of the Mediator.

8. List after six weeks alongwith Mediation Report.

9. In the meantime, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in pursuance of the FIR in question.

(RAJNI MUKHI) (MAYA KUMARI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER(NSH)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead