Supreme Court of India
HARI SINGH AHIRWAR VS. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 28 October 2026
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.16 SECTION II-E
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Nos.17082-17083/2026
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-08-2026
in MCRC No. 36832/2026 11-08-2026 in MCRC No. 36829/2026 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior]
HARI SINGH AHIRWAR & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION AND IA No. 273614/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 28-10-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL
For Petitioner(s) :Ms. Anisha Upadhyay, AOR
Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Adv.
Mr. Nilabh Sharma, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :Mr. VVV MBNS Pattabhiram, D.A.G.
Mr. Surjeet Singh Ga, Adv.
Mr. Yashraj Singh Bundela- 3281, AOR
Mrs. Pratima Singh, Adv.
Mr. Arpit Garg, Adv.
Ms. Mini Gupta, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
1. Counter to the petition has been filed by the respondent which is not on record. The Registry is directed to place it on record on the next date of hearing.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that no rejoinder is required.
3. List on 05.11.2026. (RAJNI MUKHI) (MAYA KUMARI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER(NSH) Digitally signed by RAJNI MUKHI Date: 2026.10.28 17:37:08 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified