Madras High Court

WP/36999/2026 of Tvl Prateesh Engineering Enterprises Vs The State Tax officer on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 36999 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP No. 36999 of 2026

and WMP.Nos.41476 & 41477 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012139342026}

Tvl Prateesh Engineering Enterprises

Rep. by its Managing Partner

S Rameshprabakaran,

223/2-8, Chidambaram Main Road,

Kudikadu, Pachiyankuppam Cuddalore,

Tamil Nadu- 607005.

..Petitioner

Vs

1. The State Tax officer

Chidambaram -I Assessment circle

Ground floor, Commercial Taxes building, Killai, Chidambaram, Cuddalore Tamilnadu-608 102.

2. The Deputy Commissioner (CT)

GST Appeals, Commercial Taxes Building,

Killai, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu – 608102.

..Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order dated 21.04.2025 bearing Reference No. ZD330425152074Q

passed by the 1st Respondent for the tax period 2018-19 and quash the same.

For Petitioner:

Mr. Raghunandan Sriram

For Respondents:

Mr.I.Dinesh

Additional Government Pleader (Tax)

WP No. 36999 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order dated 21.04.2025 is assailed primarily on the ground that said order travels beyond the scope of the show cause notice.

2. Adverting to the show cause notice and the order, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the show cause notice was confined to interest, whereas the impugned order makes a demand in relation to tax, interest and penalty.

3. Mr. I. Dinesh, learned Additional Government Pleader (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. He submits that the impugned order may be treated as a show cause notice.

4. Comparing the show cause notice and the impugned order, the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is liable to be accepted. Consequently, as submitted by learned Additional Government Pleader, the order may be treated as a show cause notice. The petitioner is permitted to respond thereto within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon receipt of such reply, after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a speaking order shall be issued within five months from the date of receipt of such reply.

WP No. 36999 of 2026

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 23-09-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To

1. The State Tax officer Chidambaram -I Assessment circle Ground floor, Commercial Taxes building, Killai, Chidambaram, Cuddalore Tamilnadu-608 102.

2. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) GST Appeals, Commercial Taxes Building, Killai, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu – 608102.

WP No. 36999 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 36999 of 2026 23-09-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead