Supreme Court of India
GURPREET KAUR VS. HARPAL SINGH SANDHU on 28 October 2026
ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.6 SECTION II-B
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No.41243/2026
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-01-2026
in CRMM No. 8582/2023 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh]
GURPREET KAUR & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
HARPAL SINGH SANDHU Respondent(s)
(IA No. 322475/2026 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SLP, IA
No. 322476/2026 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING SLP AND IA
No. 322477/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT)
Date : 28-10-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. Yusuf- 2593, AOR
Ms. Tanu Singhal, Adv.
Mr. Amarjeet Singh Girsa, Adv.
Mrs. Ritu Solanki, Adv.
Mr. Amit Arora, Adv.
Mr. Jatin Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Mohd. Asif Ali, Adv.
Mr. Deepak Dahiya, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
1 Exemption Application is allowed.
2. Delay condoned.
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and having gone through the materials on record, we find no good ground to interfere with the impugned Order passed by the High Court.
4. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (VISHAL ANAND) (POOJA SHARMA) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH) Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND Date: 2026.10.28 17:13:36 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified