Madras High Court
WP/631/2026 of M.Madhumithra Vs The Registrar General on 23 September 2026
WP No. 631 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNASWAMY GOVINDARAJAN
WP No. 631 of 2026
and
WMP No.761 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA010012562026}
M.Madhumithra
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Registrar General,
High Court, Madras.
2. The Principal District Judge
Principal District Court,
Cuddalore.
3. The Principal District Judge,
Principal District Court,
Tiruvannamalai.
..Respondent(s)
Prayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the first respondent vide ROC. No. 58373/ 2025/ C3 dated 18.11.2025 and also the communication of the official memorandum of the third respondent vide Dis.
No. 6301/ A/ 2025 dated 28.11.2025 and to quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to include the name of the petitioner in the panel of assistants drawn for the year 2023 in Thiruvannamalai District.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.R.Vijayakumar,
Senior Counsel
for Mr.A.V.Balusamy
For Respondent(s):
Mr.J.CHANDRAN SUNDAR SASHIKUMAR
( Uploaded on: 28/09/2026 05:07:04 pm )
WP No. 631 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The learned Senior Counsel Mr.R.Vijayakumar appearing through video conferencing on behalf of the petitioner and assisted by the counsel on record Mr.A.V.Balusamy appearing in person before this Court would make a submission that the petitioner may be permitted to raise all the grounds before the enquiry officer after passing final order.
2. Granting liberty to the petitioner to defend her case by raising both factual and legal grounds, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.G.R.,J.) 23-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SLI
( Uploaded on: 28/09/2026 05:07:04 pm )
WP No. 631 of 2026
To
1. The Registrar General, High Court, Madras.
2. The Principal District Judge Principal District Court, Cuddalore.
3. The Principal District Judge, Principal District Court, Tiruvannamalai.
( Uploaded on: 28/09/2026 05:07:04 pm )
WP No. 631 of 2026
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND KRISHNASWAMY GOVINDARAJAN, J. SLI WP No. 631 of 2026 and WMP No.761 of 2026 23-09-2026
( Uploaded on: 28/09/2026 05:07:04 pm )