Supreme Court of India

MUTHU SUMITH JAIPAL VS. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 28 October 2026

ITEM NO.10 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION II-E

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8739/2026

MUTHU SUMITH JAIPAL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. Respondent(s)

IA No. 144679/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT

IA No. 144680/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

WITH SLP(Crl) No. 8760/2026 (II-E) FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 145059/2026 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 145063/2026 IA No. 145059/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT

IA No. 145063/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

Date : 28-10-2026 These matters were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Lonkar, Adv. Ms. Sonali Suryawanshi, Adv. Ms. Pradnya Bheke, Adv. Mr. Shankey Agrawal, AOR Mr. Vashu Chaudhary, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanchit Garga, AOR Mr. Kunal Rana, Adv. Mr. Vijender Kumar, Adv. Ms. Oorja Goel, Adv. M/S. Dharmaprabhas Law Associates- 2718, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

SLP(Crl) No. 8739 and 8760 /2026 In both the matters numbered above, counter affidavit on Digitally signed by DIVYANSHI MISHRA Date: 2026.10.28 16:23:28 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

Page 1 of 2

behalf of respondent no. 1 has already been filed. Opportunity to file counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no. 2 has already been declined. Service is complete on respondent nos. 4 and 5 in SLP (Crl) No. 8739/26 and respondent no. 4 in SLP (Crl) No. 8760/26 but none has entered appearance. Service in respect of respondent no. 3 through India Post is unserved with the remarks "Missent". Learned counsel for the petitioner has served respondent no. 3 through Email and through Post at his current address in Ireland. Service through Email and Post can not be considered service by way of Dasti. Therefore, respondent no. 3 is unserved despite the grant of last opportunity. List the matters before the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chambers for directions. Copy of this Record of Proceedings be furnished to the concerned learned Advocate-on-Record for information and compliance. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG Registrar AR

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead