Supreme Court of India
PRERNA SINGH VS. COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS on 28 October 2026
ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.6 SECTION XVII-B
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Civil Appeal No(s).2569/2022
PRERNA SINGH Appellant(s)
VERSUS
COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS & ORS. Respondent(s)
IA No. 186385/2025 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION
IA No. 110835/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
Date : 28-10-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN
For Appellant(s) : Ms. Madhavi Diwan, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sudhir Naagar- 1798, AOR
Mr. Arun Kumar Nagar, Adv.
Mr. Kshitiz Sarda, Adv.
Mr. Aditya Chauhan, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :Ms. Ekta Choudhary- 3001, AOR
Ms. Rushali Sikand, Adv.
Mr. Shirish Parashar, Adv.
Mr. Gaurav Grover, Adv.
Mr. Biswajit Dubey, Adv.
Mr. Ramakant Rai, Adv.
Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, AOR
Mr. Somesh Srivastava, Adv.
Ms. Pranati Sinha, Adv.
Mr. Navin Kumar Jain Rp, Adv.
Mr. Namit Suri- 3223, AOR
Ms. Meenakshi Kalra, AOR
Mr. Harsh Sinha, Adv.
Ms. Anjali Chauhan, Adv.
Mr. Rajat Katyal, Adv.
Mr. S N Kalra, Adv.
Page 1 of 3
Digitally signed by
HARPREET KAUR
Date: 2026.10.28
16:16:11 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
Mr. Aditya Bharat Manubarwala, Adv.
Mrs. Shaila Arora, Adv.
Mrs. Akriti Aditya Manubarwala, Adv.
Mrs. Tanishka Grover, Adv.
Mrs. Deepshikha Mishra, Adv.
Mrs. Pradnya Sachin Matkar, Adv.
Mr. Bharat Thakorlal Manubarwala- 2847, AOR
M/s Manubarwala And Partners Llp, Adv.
Mr. Vikas Upadhyay- 1900, AOR
Ms. Ankita Kashyap, Adv.
Mr. Nitin Gaur, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Tarun Arora, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Heard Ms. Madhavi Diwan, the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant and Ms. Ekta Choudhary, the learned counsel appearing for the Committee of Creditors (CoC). We also heard Mr. Tarun Arora, the learned counsel representing the Court Commissioner.
2. Ms. Madhavi Diwan informs us that the matter has been kept today for further hearing before the NCLT, Delhi, Court No.2.
3. We are further informed that twice, the auction proceedings were initiated but on both the occasions, the auction failed.
4. Ms. Madhavi Diwan has a very serious grievance to redress as regards the irregular payment of Rs.50,55,565/- per month fixed towards user and occupation charges. According to her, the CoC is in arrears to the tune of
Page 2 of 3
Rs.1.44 crore towards the current user and occupation charges.
5. We permit the learned Advocate-on-Record to implead all the Members of the CoC. Cause titled be amended accordingly.
6. Issue notice to the newly impleaded respondents as to why they should not be proceeded for contempt.
7. We are informed by the learned counsel appearing for the CoC that the share which the Indian Bank and Punjab National Bank has to pay towards rent is being paid regularly.
8. List on 02.12.2026. (HARPREET KAUR) (POOJA SHARMA) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…