Supreme Court of India
THE UTTAR PRADESH CO OPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD VS. MOHD JAMEEL - on 27 October 2026
ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 63994/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-11-2023
in SA No. 603/1989 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench]
THE UTTAR PRADESH CO OPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
MOHD JAMEEL & ANR. Respondent(s)
([TO BE TAKEN UP AT 2:00 P.M.]
IA No. 289799/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
Date : 27-10-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. Prem Prakash- 1659, AOR
Ms. Vineeta Singh, Adv.
Mr. Aditya Harsh, Adv.
Ms. Deepali Nanda, Adv.
Mr. Tarush, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
Mr. Ashish Pandey- 3825, AOR
Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Adv.
Mr. Prateek Rai, Adv.
Mr. Shubham Saxena, Adv.
Mr. Ayush Yadav, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
1. Heard Mr. Prem Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Ashish Pandey, learned counsel for the contesting respondent No.1.
Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date: 2026.10.28 19:00:19 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
2. Pursuant to this Court’s previous orders, learned counsel for the petitioners, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners, submits that the petitioners are willing to offer an amount of Rs.12,34,000/- (Rupees twelve lakhs thirty four thousand), towards full and final settlement to respondent No.1.
3. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has indicated that the amount offered by the petitioners is abysmally low.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks some more time to obtain instructions and revert back to the Court.
5. As a last opportunity, time is granted to the petitioners to examine whether the petitioners are willing to enhance the compensation, as offered. No doubt, this will be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners.
6. List on 8th January, 2027.
7. It is made clear that no further opportunity will be given and if no settlement is possible, the matter will be heard on merits. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (NIKITA SINGH) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER