Supreme Court of India

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. PRADEEP GUPTA on 27 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.7 SECTION II-C

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Nos. 20077-20078/2025

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-01-2025

in CRA No. 192/2017 10-01-2025 in CRA No. 337/2017 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla]

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

PRADEEP GUPTA Respondent(s)

WITH

SLP(Crl) No. 10177/2026 (II-C)

(IA No. 127045/2026 - INTERIM BAIL)

Date : 27-10-2026 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Ajay Marwah- 2312, AOR

Mr. Mrigank Bhardwaj, Adv.

Ms. Dhriti Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Rahul Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Shivani Singh, Adv.

Mr. Ravideep Badyal, Adv.

Mr. Ravi Shandil, Adv.

Mr. Samiyam Bhardwaj, Adv.

Mr. Deepak Sinha, Adv.

Mr. Aditya Bharat Manubarwala, Adv.

Mrs. Shaila Arora, Adv.

Mrs. Tanishka Grover, Adv.

Mrs. Akriti Aditya Manubarwala, Adv.

Mrs. Pradnya Sachin Matkar, Adv.

Mrs. Deepshikha Mishra, Adv.

Ms. Charvi Virmani, Adv.

Mr. Bharat Thakorlal Manubarwala- 2847, AOR

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Aditya Bharat Manubarwala, Adv.

Mrs. Shaila Arora, Adv.

Mrs. Tanishka Grover, Adv.

Digitally signed by

babita pandey

Date: 2026.10.28

18:43:59 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

Mrs. Akriti Aditya Manubarwala, Adv.

Mrs. Deepshikha Mishra, Adv.

Mrs. Pradnya Sachin Matkar, Adv.

Ms. Charvi Virmani, Adv.

Mr. Bharat Thakorlal Manubarwala- 2847, AOR

Mr. Ajay Marwah- 2312, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

I.A. No. 127045/2026 in SLP(Crl.) No. 10177/2026 Having perused the counter affidavit/reply filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh, we find no grounds made out to grant suspension of sentence and consequential bail to the applicant at this stage. The interlocutory application is, accordingly, dismissed. (BABITA PANDEY) (PREETI SAXENA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead