Supreme Court of India
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. PRADEEP GUPTA on 27 October 2026
ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.7 SECTION II-C
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Nos. 20077-20078/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-01-2025
in CRA No. 192/2017 10-01-2025 in CRA No. 337/2017 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
PRADEEP GUPTA Respondent(s)
WITH
SLP(Crl) No. 10177/2026 (II-C)
(IA No. 127045/2026 - INTERIM BAIL)
Date : 27-10-2026 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Ajay Marwah- 2312, AOR
Mr. Mrigank Bhardwaj, Adv.
Ms. Dhriti Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Rahul Kumar, Adv.
Ms. Shivani Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ravideep Badyal, Adv.
Mr. Ravi Shandil, Adv.
Mr. Samiyam Bhardwaj, Adv.
Mr. Deepak Sinha, Adv.
Mr. Aditya Bharat Manubarwala, Adv.
Mrs. Shaila Arora, Adv.
Mrs. Tanishka Grover, Adv.
Mrs. Akriti Aditya Manubarwala, Adv.
Mrs. Pradnya Sachin Matkar, Adv.
Mrs. Deepshikha Mishra, Adv.
Ms. Charvi Virmani, Adv.
Mr. Bharat Thakorlal Manubarwala- 2847, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Aditya Bharat Manubarwala, Adv.
Mrs. Shaila Arora, Adv.
Mrs. Tanishka Grover, Adv.
Digitally signed by
babita pandey
Date: 2026.10.28
18:43:59 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
Mrs. Akriti Aditya Manubarwala, Adv.
Mrs. Deepshikha Mishra, Adv.
Mrs. Pradnya Sachin Matkar, Adv.
Ms. Charvi Virmani, Adv.
Mr. Bharat Thakorlal Manubarwala- 2847, AOR
Mr. Ajay Marwah- 2312, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
I.A. No. 127045/2026 in SLP(Crl.) No. 10177/2026 Having perused the counter affidavit/reply filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh, we find no grounds made out to grant suspension of sentence and consequential bail to the applicant at this stage. The interlocutory application is, accordingly, dismissed. (BABITA PANDEY) (PREETI SAXENA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)