Supreme Court of India
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. ANAND KUMAR TEKARIWAL on 27 October 2026
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.27830/2024
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31-05-2023
in WC No.32728/2000 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
Petitioners
VERSUS
ANAND KUMAR TEKARIWAL & ORS.
Respondents
[TO BE TAKEN UP AT 2.00 PM]
I.A. No.138750/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
I.A. No.138747/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. I.A. No.138749/2024-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ ANNEXURES
WITH S.L.P. (C) No.27831/2024 (XI) I.A. No.109324/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT
I.A. No.109322/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
Date : 27-10-2026 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P. S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Adv. Ms. Saroj Tripathi- 2233, AOR Ms. Vidushi Pandey, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Shashank Renwa, Adv.
Mr. R. Venkataramani, Attorney General for India Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. Kamlendra Mishra- 1367, AOR Mr. Ruchir Ranjan Rai, Adv. Mr. Ashiwan Mishra, Adv. Ms. Vaidruti Mishra, Adv. Ms. Aditi Mishra, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shyamal Narain, Adv.
Digitally signed by MANIK KUMAR Date: 2026.10.28 13:17:23 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
Ms. Sthavi Asthana- 4038, AOR Mr. Prakhar Singh, Adv. Ms. Vineeta Singh, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Mr. R. Venkataramani, learned Attorney General for India, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, seeks a further adjournment.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents objects to the said request and reiterates the objections taken earlier, placing reliance on the earlier orders passed by this Court.
3. Although, by the order dated 16th September 2026, this Court had made it clear that no further prayer for adjournment on behalf of the petitioners would be entertained, having regard to the request made by the learned Attorney General for India, and as a last opportunity, the prayer for adjournment is allowed.
4. Re-list the special leave petitions on 19th November 2026 at 2:00 p.m., as prayed by the learned Attorney.
5. It is made clear that no further prayer for adjournment on behalf of the petitioners shall be entertained. (MANIK KUMAR) (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)