Supreme Court of India
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K VS. MUNEEB IQBAL on 27 October 2026
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
INHERENT JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. /2026
[@ DIARY NO(S). 8423/2026]
IN
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.26374/2025]
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
MUNEEB IQBAL Respondent(s)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
1. The present Review Petition is defective. Despite the defects being communicated to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the same have yet not been cured.
2. Delay condoned.
3. We have perused the review petition and the materials on record. We do not find any such error apparent on the face of record which may warrant a review of order dated 12.09.2025.
4. The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. ………………………………………………………………………………J [MANOJ MISRA] ………………………………………………………………………………J [UJJAL BHUYAN] New Delhi October 27, 2026 Digitally signed by KAVITA PAHUJA Date: 2026.10.28 17:25:16 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
ITEM NO.1001 SECTION XI-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO(S). 8423/2026 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-09-2025 in SLP(C) No. No. 26374/2025 passed by the Supreme Court of India] UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS MUNEEB IQBAL Respondent(s) IA No. 43930/2026 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
Date : 27-10-2026 This matter was circulated today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN By Circulation UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. The present Review Petition is defective. Despite the defects being communicated to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the same have yet not been cured.
2. Delay condoned.
3. The review petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order which is placed on the file.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (KAVITA PAHUJA) (SAPNA BANSAL) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)