Supreme Court of India
ASHOK KUMAR SAINI VS. VIPIN DEVAL on 27 October 2026
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
INHERENT JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. /2026
@ DIARY NO(S). 55359/2026
IN
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.8020/2026
ASHOK KUMAR SAINI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
VIPIN DEVAL & ORS. Respondent(s)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
1. Application for hearing of the review petition in the open Court is rejected.
2. Delay condoned.
3. We have perused the review petition and the materials on record. We do not find any such error apparent on the face of record which may warrant a review of order dated 23.02.2026.
4. The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. ………………………………………………………………………………J [MANOJ MISRA] ………………………………………………………………………………J [MANMOHAN] New Delhi October 27, 2026 Digitally signed by KAVITA PAHUJA Date: 2026.10.28 17:25:16 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
ITEM NO.1002 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO(S). 55359/2026 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-02-2026 in SLP(C) No. No. 8020/2026 passed by the Supreme Court of India] ASHOK KUMAR SAINI Petitioner(s) VERSUS VIPIN DEVAL & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 273611/2026 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION, IA No. 273610/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 273613/2026 - ORAL HEARING
Date : 27-10-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN By Circulation UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Application for hearing of the review petition in the open Court is rejected.
2. Delay condoned.
3. The review petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order which is placed on the file.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (KAVITA PAHUJA) (SAPNA BANSAL) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)