Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./8061/2026 of LAKSH ARORA & ORS. Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. on 28 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL.M.C. 8061/2026

Page 1 of 2 pages

$~68

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 28.10.2026

CNR No. DLHC010516402026

+

CRL.M.C. 8061/2026 & CRL.M.A. 33716/2026

LAKSH ARORA & ORS.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr.

Amit

Tayal

(through

videoconferencing) and Ms. Ankita

Goyal, Advocates.

versus

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with

SI Shivpal Singh, PS Punjabi Bagh.

Ms. Nikita Jain, Advocate for R-2

with R-2.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 146/2023 of PS Punjabi Bagh for offence under Section 498A/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners.

2. Learned APP for State assisted by IO/SI Shivpal, accepts notice and submits that State has no objection to this petition. GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155 70996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26 fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.28 17:29:08 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:28.10.2026 17:28:08 Signature Not Verified

CRL.M.C. 8061/2026

Page 2 of 2 pages

3. Respondent no.2, identified by IO, accepts notice.

4. Keeping in mind the nature of the dispute, I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. It is also submitted by her that since 08.10.2024, she is living happily with the petitioners as a close family. Respondent no.2 submits that one son was born from her wedlock with the present petitioner no.1, and that son is also living happily with the family, so now she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners.

5. Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through a full dress trial.

6. Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 146/2023 of PS Punjabi Bagh for offence under Section 498A/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. Pending application also stands disposed of.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) OCTOBER 28, 2026/dr

GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4a fec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626ca cca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5 d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c48796 5ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.28 17:28:54 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:28.10.2026 17:28:08 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead