Delhi High Court

ARB.P./1343/2026 of SERVOTECH ELECTRICALS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs SIGNATURE GLOBAL INDIA LIMITED on 15 October 2026

$~4

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010353212026

+

ARB.P. 1343/2026

SERVOTECH ELECTRICALS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr. Ankit

Kumar, Advs.

versus

SIGNATURE GLOBAL INDIA LIMITED

.....Respondent

Through:

Ms. Akansha Singh, Ms. Katyayani

Dwivedi, Mr. Yash Vikram Singh,

Ms. Shagun Choudhary, Mr. Vikrant

Deshwal, Mr. Vijay Gupta, Mr.

Bhavya Sehrawat, Mr. Kirti Gupta,

Advs.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH BHATT

JUDGMENT(ORAL)

%

15.10.2026

1. Ms. Akanksha Singh, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent, submits that the Respondent has no objection to the appointment of an Arbitrator. Learned Counsel for both the parties have also submitted that in a connected matter between the parties the Arbitrator has already been appointed and pray that the same arbitrator may also be appointed in the present matter.

2. It is well settled that, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Act, the scope of enquiry is confined to examining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement1.

1 SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754

RANA Signing

Page 1 of 2

3. In the present case, there is no dispute with regard to the existence of a valid arbitration clause between the parties.

4. Both the parties have agreed and also suggested a name to be appointed as Arbitrator with respect to the reference of the disputes to arbitration. In the aforesaid circumstances, the prayer is allowed.

5. Accordingly, Mr. Sagar Saxena, Advocate, (Mob. No. 9871156571) is appointed as a learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arisen between the parties. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall enter upon the reference within three weeks from today.

6. The learned Sole Arbitrator will proceed to the arbitration proceedings subject to furnishing requisite disclosures as required under Section 12(2) of the Act within three weeks of entering reference.

7. The arbitration shall be carried under the rules and aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”). The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.

8. It shall be open to the parties to raise all pleas, including objection as to arbitrability and jurisdiction, before the learned Sole Arbitrator who shall decide the same in accordance with law.

9. It is clarified that the observations made herein are only for the purpose of deciding the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Act. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall adjudicate the disputes independently and on their own merits, uninfluenced by any observations contained in the present order.

10. The Registry is directed to send a receipt of this order to Mr. Sagar Saxena, learned Arbitrator through all permissible modes including email.

RANA Signing

11. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above terms.

DINESH BHATT, J. OCTOBER 15, 2026/ss Signed By:MONIKA RANA Signing

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead