Delhi High Court
O.M.P. (COMM)/72/2021 of TANGNU ROMAI POWER GENERATION PRIVATE LIMITED Vs SAIURJA HYDEL PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED on 8 October 2026
O.M.P. (COMM) 72/2021 and other conn.
$~73 & 34
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010027742020
+
O.M.P. (COMM) 72/2021, I.A. 2788/2021 & I.A. 2790/2021
TANGNU ROMAI POWER GENERATION PRIVATE
LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through:
None.
versus
SAIURJA HYDEL PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Tarun Johri and Mr. Ankur
Gupta, Advs.
34.
CNR No. DLHC010027752020
+
O.M.P. (COMM) 73/2021, I.A. 2791/2021 & I.A. 2793/2021
TANGNU ROMAI POWER GENERATION PRIVATE
LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through:
None.
versus
SAIURJA HYDEL PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Tarun Johri and Mr. Ankur
Gupta, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER(ORAL)
%
08.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None has appeared on behalf of the Petitioner.
Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:09.10.2026 11:52:30 Signature Not Verified
O.M.P. (COMM) 72/2021 and other conn.
2. On the last date of hearing also none has appeared on behalf of the Petitioner.
3. It is borne from the record that the Petitioner is undergoing CIRP and Mr. Nitin Kant Setia, learned Counsel appeared on behalf of the Resolution Professional (RP) on 21.01.2025. However, there has been no appearance on behalf of the RP after the said date.
4. In this light, by the last order dated 10.07.2026, the following direction was passed:
“2. On 21.01.2025, Mr. Nitin Kant Setia, learned Counsel, had appeared on behalf of the Resolution Professional (RP). However, there is no appearance on behalf of the RP after 21.01.2025.
3. It is made clear that if there is no appearance on behalf of the RP on the next date of hearing, this Court will presume that the RP is not interested in pursuing the case and the matter will be dismissed for non-prosecution.”
5. Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J OCTOBER 8, 2026/at
Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:09.10.2026 11:52:30 Signature Not Verified