Madras High Court

WP/36743/2026 of Day To Day Office Suppliers Vs Assistant Commissioner ST on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 36743 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.09.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP No. 36743 of 2026

and W.M.P. Nos.41180 and 41183 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA011898832026}

Day To Day Office Suppliers

Represented by its Proprietor

Abdullahbasha Ibrahim

Ground Floor, No.68, Galilayapuram Street, Cathedral Road, Gopalapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600086

..Petitioner

Vs

Assistant Commissioner (ST)

Royapettah Assessment Circle,

Room No 206 Second Floor,

Farm Village, South Tower

Nandanam Chennai 600 035

..Respondent

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the respondent vide Order of Assessment bearing Reference No ZD330824263212M in GSTIN/33AAQPI2822Q1ZB/2019-20 for the assessment period between April 2019 and March 2020 dated 28.08.2024

and to quash the same.

For Petitioner:

Mr.Saravanan G

For Respondent:

Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran,

Additional Government Pleader (Tax)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order dated 28.08.2024 is assailed primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice.

( Uploaded on: 29/09/2026 10:48:28 am )

WP No. 36743 of 2026

2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Additional Government Pleader (Tax), accepts notice for the respondent.

3. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 50% of the disputed tax demand under the impugned order as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

4. Subject to the remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re- consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within five months from the date of remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfillment of the above condition, any recovery measures, including by way of garnishee proceedings, shall not be proceeded with and the bank attachment relating to the impugned order shall stand raised.

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 22.09.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi

( Uploaded on: 29/09/2026 10:48:28 am )

WP No. 36743 of 2026

To The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Royapettah Assessment Circle, Room No 206 Second Floor, Farm Village, South Tower Nandanam Chennai 600 035

( Uploaded on: 29/09/2026 10:48:28 am )

WP No. 36743 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. mmi WP No. 36743 of 2026 22.09.2026

( Uploaded on: 29/09/2026 10:48:28 am )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead