Madras High Court

WP/36788/2026 of Tvl Noble leathers Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer 2 on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 36788 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.09.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP No. 36788 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA011913482026}

and

WMP Nos. 41234 & 41235 of 2026

Tvl Noble Leathers

Rep by its Proprietor Mr M. Rasheed Ahmed No.2/1, High Road, Pernampattu, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 635 810

..Petitioner

Vs

The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer – 2,

Gudiyatham (West) Assessment Circle,

Railway Station Road, Parasarampati Village, Gudiyatham, Vellore 635 803.

..Respondent

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the Order dated 03.09.2025 with Ref. No.ZD330925045471E, pertaining to the Financial Year 2018-19, passed by the Respondent, and quash the same.

For Petitioner:

Ms.Vaani Sreekant Iyer

for M/s.Adithya Reddy

For Respondent:

Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran,

Additional Government Pleader (Tax)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order dated 03.09.2025 is assailed primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice.

2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Additional Government Pleader (Tax), accepts notice for the respondent.

WP No. 36788 of 2026

3. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 50% of the disputed tax demand under the impugned order as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

4. Subject to the remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re- consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within five months from the date of remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfillment of the above condition, the bank attachment, if any, relating to the impugned order shall stand raised.

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 22.09.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi To The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer – 2, Gudiyatham (West) Assessment Circle, Railway Station Road, Parasarampati Village, Gudiyatham, Vellore 635 803.

WP No. 36788 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. mmi WP No. 36788 of 2026 22.09.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead