Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5281/2026 of Yamuna Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. on 22 September 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 22.09.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN
WP Crl.(MD) NO. 5281 of 2026
{CNR: HCMD011303162026}
Case QR
Yamuna
... Petitioner
.Vs.
State of Tamilnadu Rep. by
1. The Superintendent of Police
Tirunelveli District,
Tirunelveli.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
Valliyur, Tirunelveli District.
3. The Inspector of Police
Radhapuram Police Station
Radhapuram,
Tirunelveli District.
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to complete the enquiry in C.S.R.No. 352/2026 dt, 20.07.2026 within a time frame as may be stipulated by this Court, by duly considering the petitioner's representation, dated 10.08.2026.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Manianandh
For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to complete the enquiry in C.S.R.No. 352/2026 dt, 20.07.2026 within a time frame as may be stipulated by this Court, by duly considering the petitioner's representation, dated 10.08.2026.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the records.
3. Alleging that no action has been taken by the respondent police on the C.S.R. entry, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present petition.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that two summonses have already been issued to the petitioner as well as the rival parties for their appearance, but they failed to appear. He further submitted that if the petitioner cooperates with the enquiry, the respondent police will complete the same as expeditiously as possible.
5. Recording the aforesaid submissions, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the petitioner to appear before the 3rd respondent within a period of one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon the petitioner's appearance, the 3rd respondent police shall record his statement, examine the rival parties, and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks thereafter.
6. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. 22.09.2026 TM To
1. The Superintendent of Police Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Valliyur, Tirunelveli District.
3. The Inspector of Police Radhapuram Police Station Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District.
DR.P.MURUGAN, J., TM
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. WP.Crl.(MD).No.5281 of 2026 22.09.2026