Madras High Court

WP CRL.(MD)/5298/2026 of T.Kasthuri Vs The Superintendent of Police on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 22.09.2026

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN

WP Crl.(MD) NO. 5298 of

{CNR: HCMD011295062026}

Case QR

T.Kasthuri

... Petitioner

.Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police

Ramanathapuram District.

2. The Inspector of Police

District Crime Branch,

(DCB II Land Grabbing Department),

Ramanathapuram District.

... Respondents

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioners representation dated on 10.08.2026, on merits and in accordance with law within the time frame that may be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Ms.C.R.Ponnuthai

For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioners representation dated on 10.08.2026, on merits and in accordance with law within the time frame that may be fixed by this Court.

2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the records.

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that as per the petitioner's complaint, one C.Shanthi is shown as the accused. The said C.Shanthi had already approached this Court in W.P.Crl.(MD) No. 4898 of 2026 seeking directions. By order dated 01.09.2026, this Court directed the respondent police to enquire into the complaint filed by C.Shanthi and proceed further. As the matter is currently under enquiry, both the petitioner and the said C.Shanthi have filed complaints against each other.

4. Recording the aforesaid submissions, the respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's complaint as well as that of C.Shanthi, record their respective statements, and take a decision in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. 22.09.2026 TM To

1. The Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram District.

2. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch, (DCB II Land Grabbing Department), Ramanathapuram District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

DR.P.MURUGAN, J., TM WP.Crl.(MD).No.5298 of 2026 22.09.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead