Madras High Court

CRL RC/2119/2026 of Karol Bernatsha Vs The State Rep by the Commissioner of Police on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

CRL RC No. 2119 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012185242026}

Karol Bernatsha

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The State Rep by the Commissioner of Police Tambaram Commissionerate, Elcot Sez, Karapakkam, Sholinganallur, Chennai.

2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police

Pallikaranai Range, Medavakkam,

Chennai.

3. The Inspector of Police

S-15, Selaiyur Police Station,

Selaiyur, Chennai.

..Respondent(s)

Prayer: Revision filed under Section 438 r/w Section 442 of the BNSS Act, to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 04.07.2026 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tambaram in Crl.M.P.No.1793 of 2025 and to set aside the same and direct the Learned Magistrate to consider and dispose of the same afresh on merits, after affording reasonable opportunity to the petitioner.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.Babu Varadharajan D

For Respondent(s):

Mr.A.Amarnath

Additional Public Prosecutor

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The revision challenges the dismissal of the petitioner's application, seeking registration of First Information Report (FIR), on the sole ground that the petitioner had not appeared when the matter was called.

2. Mr.Babu Varadharajan D, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner has a good case on merits and unless the case is decided on merits, the petitioner would be put to irrepairable loss.

3. Learned Mr.A.Amarnath, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents.

4. Considering the fact that the petition was dismissed only on the ground of non-appearance of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to give one more opportunity to the petitioner to present his case on merits. Hence, the order impugned is set aside and the learned Magistrate shall decide the petition on merits and in accordance with law. the present Criminal Revision Case, as such, stands allowed. 21-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No (drm)

To:

1. The Commissioner of Police Tambaram Commissionerate, Elcot Sez, Karapakkam, Sholinganallur, Chennai.

2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police Pallikaranai Range, Medavakkam, Chennai.

3. The Inspector of Police S-15, Selaiyur Police Station, Selaiyur, Chennai.

4. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tambaram.

SUNDER MOHAN, J. (drm) CRL.R.C.No.2119 of 2026 21-09-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead