Madras High Court

CRP/5331/2026 of Gautham Chand Chopra Vs Sumit A Challani on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21-09-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI

CRP No. 5331 of 2026 and CMP No.23144 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA011994842026}

1. Gautham Chand Chopra

M/s.G.C.Chopra and Co., Chartered

Accountants, Challani Plaza, Shop No.29

and 30, IInd Floor, No.36 Veerappan

Street, Sowcarpet, Chennai 600 079.

Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. Sumit A Challani

Rep. by his Power of Attorney, Cum

Property Manager, B.Sampathraj Jangid,

Having office at No.36 Veerappan Street, Sowcarpet, Chennai 600 079.

Respondent(s)

Revision filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 20.07.2026 passed in RLTA No.98 of 2025 by Hon’ble IV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai confirming the fair and decretal order dated 14.06.2024 in RLTOP No.137 of 2020 passed by the learned XV Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.S.Shyam Kumar

For Respondent(s):

Mr.K.Ramachandran

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The petitioner has filed an affidavit of undertaking, undertaking to vacate Shop Nos.29 and 30, 2nd Floor, Challani Plaza, No.36, Veerappan Street, Sowcarpet, Chennai-600 079 on or before 31.01.2027. The petitioner has also undertaken to pay the present contractual rent of Rs.5,890/-(Rupees Five Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety Only) without any default.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent, on instruction, admits that an advance of Rs.45,000/-(Rupees Forty Five Thousand Only) is available and it shall be refunded across the petitioner vacating and handing over vacant possession on or before 31.01.2027.

3. The respondent/landlord undertakes to withdraw pending execution petition in EP No.922 of 2026.

4. Needless to state that in the event of there being any default committed by the petitioner, the respondent/landlord shall always initiate contempt of Court proceedings.

5. With the above observation, the civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 21.09.2026 Index:yes/no Website:yes/no Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order sr To

1. The IV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai

2. The XV Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.

P.B.BALAJI.,J sr CRP No. 5331 of 2026 21.09.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead