Madras High Court
CRP.SR/97566/2026 of B.Venugopal Vs P.Vasantha on 21 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21-09-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
CRP SR No.97566 of 2026 and CMP No. 19623 of 2026
1. B.Venugopal
s/o Purushothaman Reddy, No.2/143
Pillaiyar Koil street, Mettupalayam
Veeraraghapuram post Thiruverkadu,
Chennai 77
2. V.Sudhakar
No.2/143 Pillaiyar Koil street,
Mettupalayam Veeraraghapuram post
Thiruverkadu, Chennai 77
3. V.Suresh
No.2/143 Pillaiyar Koil street,
Mettupalayam Veeraraghapuram post
Thiruverkadu, Chennai 77
Petitioners
Vs
1. P.Vasantha
W/o P.L.Purushothaman naidu No.9, Judge
Chellap street, Poonamallee, Chennai 56
Respondent(s)
Revision filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the order dated 30.11.2022 in EA No.528 of 2020 in EP No.57 of 2014 in O.S.No.321 of 1994 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee.
For Petitioners:
Mr.I.Arockia Selvaraj
For Respondent(s):
Mr.V.Manohar
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Learned counsel for the respondent Mr.V.Manohar brings to my notice that the very same impugned order in EA No.528 of 2020 dated 30.11.2022 was challenged before this Court in CRP No.4349 of 2022 and the said revision came to be dismissed on 25.07.2024. Learned counsel would further state that the dismissal of the revision was also brought to the notice of the Executing Court and subsequently, the Execution Petition has also been terminated.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would however state that he has come on change of vakalat and he is not aware of the earlier unsuccessful challenge to the very same order in EA No.528 of 2020.
3. However, the fact remains that by order dated 25.07.2024, this Court dismissed CRP No.4349 of 2022 which was a revision challenging the order passed in EA No.528 of 2020 dated 30.11.2022. The very same order is now under challenge in the present revision petition, that too, with a delay of 1192 days. The affidavit in support of the condone delay application does not even disclose the fact that earlier challenge to the very same impugned order was unsuccessful before this Court in CRP No.4349 of 2022.
4. Hence I do not see any merit or bonafide in the application, seeking condonation of delay and the revision itself is not maintainable in view of the very same order already challenged before this Court unsuccessfully.
5. Accordingly, CMP No.19623 of 2026 is dismissed. Consequently, the civil revision petition is dismissed at the SR stage itself. No costs. 21.09.2026 Index:yes/no Website:yes/no Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order sr To The Subordinate Court, Poonamallee
P.B.BALAJI.,J sr CRP SR No.97566 of 2026 and CMP No. 19623 of 2026 21.09.2026