Madras High Court

CONT P/327/2024 of K.Rathinavelu Vs Thiru.A.Karthik IAS. and another on 18 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CONT.P.No.327 of 2024

CNR: {HCMA012162952023}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

CONT.P.No.327 of 2024

K.Rathinavelu,

Lecturer in English (Retd.)

No.21, Kulandaivel Street,

Marapparai - 621 306.

Trichy District.

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. Thiru.A.Karthik, IAS.,

Principal Secretary to Government,

Higher Education Department,

Fort St.Geroge,

Chennai - 600 009.

2. Dr.G.Geetha,

Director of Collegiate Education,

Institute of Advanced Study in

Education Campus,

No.577 Anna Salai, Saidapet,

Chennai - 600 015.

...Respondents

This Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 for willful disobedience of the order in W.P.No.9538 of 2013 dated 04.03.2022.

For Petitioner

:

Mr.R.Saseetharan

For Respondents

:

Ms.B.Kaviya,

Government Advocate

CONT.P.No.327 of 2024

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This Contempt Petition arises out of the Order dated 04.03.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.9538 of 2013.

2. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the Respondents submits that the office of the Accountant General (A & E), Tamil Nadu, Chennai has issued an Admissibility Report of Entitlements of Pensionary Benefits of Retiring Employees, to the Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Madurai Region, Madurai on 05.02.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the pensionary benefits of the Petitioner are revised with effect from 01.12.2001; and thus, the Respondents have complied with the Order dated 04.03.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.9538 of 2013. The learned Government Advocate for the Respondents has also produced a copy of the said Admissibility Report as well as Form No.10E furnishing the particulars of Petitioner’s income, before this Court.

3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner does not dispute the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate for the Respondents.

4. A copy of the aforesaid documents produced by the learned Government Advocate for the Respondents are taken on record.

CONT.P.No.327 of 2024

5. Considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate for the Respondents of compliance with the order of this Court dated 04.03.2022 in W.P.No.9538 of 2013, this Court is of the view that there is no necessity to pass further orders in this petition. Hence, this Contempt Petition is closed. 18-09-2026 mrr Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes/No To

1. Thiru.A.Karthik IAS., Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Fort St.Geroge, Chennai - 600 009.

2. Dr.G.Geetha, Director of Collegiate Education, Institute of Advanced Study in Education Campus, No.577 Anna Salai, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

CONT.P.No.327 of 2024

T.VINOD KUMAR, J. mrr CONT.P.No.327 of 2024 18-09-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead