Madras High Court

CONT P(MD)/2243/2026 of M.NAGARAJ Vs THIRUMALAI on 18 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CONT P(MD) No. 2243 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 18-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

CONT P(MD) No. 2243 of 2026

in

W.P.(MD)No.29576 of 2025

CNR:{HCMD010954782026}

M.Nagaraj

S/o.Late.Mariyappan

Colony, Ramarajapuram Village

Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1.Thirumalai

Revenue Divisional Officer

Nilakottai Taluk

Dindigul District.

2.Mrs. N.Nagamani

D/o. M.Nagaraj,,

Colony, Ramarajapuram Village,

Nilakkottai, Dindigul District.

(R2 is suo motu impleaded

vide order dated 11.09.2026)

..Respondent(s)

Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor for his willful disobedience of implementing the order passed by this Court in WP(MD)No.29576 of 2025

Order dated 22.10.2025.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.S.Sivaprakash

For Respondent(s):

Mr.M.S.Parthiban,

Government Advocate.

__________

( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 04:06:16 pm )

CONT P(MD) No. 2243 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2. The learned Government Advocate brings to my notice that W.P. (MD)No.29576 of 2025 was filed under a misconception. The writ petitioner's child Nagamani was born on 23.05.1992. However, it was projected before me that she was born on 05.03.1993. It is also now pointed out that the birth was duly registered. However, in all other documents such as Aadhaar card, etc., the date of birth has been shown as 05.03.1993. Probably that was why to bring the birth certificate in alignment with the other entries, the writ petition was filed.

3. The respondent is right in his contention that there cannot be issuance of two birth certificates. However, the respondent is ready to issue one more birth certificate reflecting the correct date of birth, that is, 23.05.1992.

4. I direct the respondent herein to incorporate the name of Nagamani as well as the name of the parents in the said birth certificate to be issued. Liberty is also granted for amending the date of birth entered in the other records. This contempt petition is closed. 18-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PMU __________

( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 04:06:16 pm )

CONT P(MD) No. 2243 of 2026 To The Revenue Divisional Officer Nilakottai Taluk Dindigul District. __________

( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 04:06:16 pm )

CONT P(MD) No. 2243 of 2026 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. PMU CONT P(MD) No. 2243 of 2026 18-09-2026 __________

( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 04:06:16 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead