Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/4881/2026 of T. Vanathai Vs The District Collector on 17 September 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 17.09.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE P.MURUGAN
WP Crl.(MD) NO. 4881 of
{CNR: HCMD011211432026}
Case QR
T.Vanathai
... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector
Virudhunagar District
Virudhunagar.
2. The Superintendent of Police
Virudhunagar District
Virudhunagar.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO)
Sivakasi Revenue Division
Virudhunagar.
4. The Tahsildar
Srivilliputhur
Virudhunagar District.
5. The Inspector of Police
Malli Police Station
Virudhunagar District.
6. Murugan
Village Thalaivar
Alathur Village
Appanayakkanpatti
Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District.
7. Dhanaraj
Village Thalaivar
Alathur Village
Appanayakkanpatti
Srivilliputhur
Virudhunagar District.
8. Muneeswari
... Respondents
PRAYER :- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 to 5 respondents to take stringent crminal and statutory action aginst respondents 6 to 8 based on the petitioners representation dated 20.08.2026 and directing respondents 1 and 4 to immediately conduct an Enquiry to eradicate the illegal social boycott imposed on the petitioner, her family, and supporter Suresh and his Family and consequentially directing the respondents 2 and 5 to provide adequate police protection to the life and personal liberty of the petitioner and her family members and pass appropriate orders within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner
: Mr.S.Sundaramoorthi
For Respondents
: Mr.D.Rajaboopathy for R2 & R5
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
Mr.A.Sivasubramanian for R1, R3 & R4
Additional Government Pleader
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the case.
2. Permission granted. The learned counsel for the petitioner has endorsed like so. He has also circulated a letter to the Registry to that effect. Hence, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Index : Yes / No 17.09.2026
Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No TM To
1. The District Collector Virudhunagar District Virudhunagar.
2. The Superintendent of Police Virudhunagar District Virudhunagar.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) Sivakasi Revenue Division Virudhunagar.
4. The Tahsildar
Virudhunagar District.
5. The Inspector of Police Malli Police Station Virudhunagar District.
DR. P. MURUGAN,J. TM
6. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
WP.Crl.(MD) No.4881 of 2026 17.09.2026