Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5244/2026 of Aayisha Gani Vs The State of Tamilnadu, rep on 17 September 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 17.09.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN
WP Crl.(MD) NO. 5244 of
{CNR: HCMD011295692026}
Case QR
Aayisha Gani
... Petitioner
.Vs.
1. The State of Tamilnadu, rep by
The Superintendent of Police
Ramanathapuram District
Ramanthapuram.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
Muthukulathur
Ramanathapuram District.
3. The Inspector of Police
Muthukulathur Police Station
Ramanathapuram District.
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take action based on the complaint dated 20.08.2026 submitted by the petitioner, within the stipulateed time fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arputharaj
For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
( Uploaded on: 18/09/2026 11:17:52 am )
WP.Crl.(MD)No.5244 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take action based on the complaint dated 20.08.2026 submitted by the petitioner, within the stipulateed time fixed by this Court.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the records.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submits that upon receiving the complaint, the respondent police assigned C.S.R. No. 182 of 2026 on 22.08.2026.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submits that the petitioner's complaint was duly attended to, and C.S.R. No. 182 of 2026 was issued on 22.08.2026. During the course of the police enquiry, it was revealed that the dispute pertains purely to money transactions. Consequently, the respondent police closed the enquiry, advising the parties to approach the competent Civil Court for recovery of money.
( Uploaded on: 18/09/2026 11:17:52 am )
WP.Crl.(MD)No.5244 of 2026
5. A copy of the closure report has been produced before this Court and taken on record.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioner admits that a copy of the closure report was duly served on the petitioner by post on 15.09.2026.
7. Recording the aforesaid submissions and the closure of the complaint, no further orders are required in this petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed.
8. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the competent Judicial Magistrate / Criminal Court by filing a protest petition or a private complaint, or by approaching the competent Civil Court, if so advised, in accordance with the law. No costs. 17.09.2026 TM To
1. The State of Tamilnadu, rep by The Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram District Ramanthapuram.
( Uploaded on: 18/09/2026 11:17:52 am )
WP.Crl.(MD)No.5244 of 2026
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Muthukulathur Ramanathapuram District.
3. The Inspector of Police Muthukulathur Police Station Ramanathapuram District.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
( Uploaded on: 18/09/2026 11:17:52 am )
WP.Crl.(MD)No.5244 of 2026 DR.P.MURUGAN, J., TM s WP.Crl.(MD).No.5244 of 2026 17.09.2026
( Uploaded on: 18/09/2026 11:17:52 am )