Madras High Court

WP CRL.(MD)/5246/2026 of V. Nambirajan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. on 17 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 17.09.2026

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN

WP Crl.(MD) NO. 5246 of

{CNR: HCMD011309892026}

Case QR

V.Nambirajan

... Petitioner

.Vs.

The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its

1.The Superintendent of Police,

Madurai District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Melur Taluk,

Madurai District.

3. The Inspector Of Police

Melur Police Station,

Melur Taluk,

Madurai District.

... Respondents

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent police to consider the petitioners complaint dt. 08.09.2026 and further take into consideration of all the subsequent illegal activities of the rival parties, after the registration of the CSR No.0585/2026.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Mani

For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent police to consider the petitioners complaint dt. 08.09.2026 and further take into consideration of all the subsequent illegal activities of the rival parties, after the registration of the CSR No.0585/2026.

2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the records.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though CSR has been registered on the complaint of the petitioner, there is no progress in the enquiry. Therefore, direction may be issued to the respondents to conduct further enquiry within a time stipulated by this Court.

4. This Court, without going into the merits of the case, directed the third respondent to conduct enquiry on the petitioner's complaint dated 08.09.2026, by issuing summons to the petitioner as well as the rival party under Section 64

of the BNSS, 2023, and thereafter take an appropriate decision on the complaint in accordance with law. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 17.09.2026 TM To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Melur Taluk, Madurai District.

3. The Inspector Of Police Melur Police Station, Melur Taluk, Madurai District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

DR.P.MURUGAN, J., TM WP.Crl.(MD).No.5246 of 2026 17.09.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead